Showing posts with label Issue number four. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Issue number four. Show all posts

Sunday, 30 June 2013

Epilogue to the June Musepaper

It can be said that the end of the school year is like the 31st of December – it is a turning point when one should reflect on successes and failures and size up areas for improvement. 

There have been four issues of the Musepaper so far, and gradually it has developed into its current form. The magazine is more selective in its officially published contributions, it indeed is beginning to give the readers an idea about English-speaking Prague (events taking place; interesting personages) and hopefully it is a positive motivation for all to write creatively in English. Were there any failures? Yes, such as the general lack of enthusiasm and support for the project and also the expected missing of deadlines…

While the Musepaper will take now a 3 months’ break from publishing PDF issues, the website will not. It will continue to be updated with contributions you send in during the summer. What could do? Short stories/vignettes; poems; travel articles; reviews of a book/movie/music or film festival… There are no deadlines; it is all up to you to send your creations whenever you want to elijahwoodrox@gmail.com. I am looking forward to receiving them.

May the summer bring you all the favour of muses or at least a fair amount of amusement!

30.5: The Day You Could Adore or Prague Fashion Night




Finally. Prague. The historical centre of the city turned glossy and glamorous that Thursday, 30th of May, welcoming guests from different places of residence. Despite the bad weather, the night gathered hundreds of visitors and all the shops at Pařížská street were presenting their new collections and newly opened exhibitions. The one and the most stunning Monroe-inspired shoes exhibition was held in Salvatore Ferragamo  store where the guests like Giovanna Gentile Ferragamo, the designer`s daughter, and Petra Němcová, the Czech gorgeous model, were spotted and admired. The limited shoes collection had been released for sale and was that night first presented by this elegant lady Ferragamo.


Yes, a chilly late spring rain didn’t keep fashion addicts and any kind of enthusiasts from coming out to celebrate the first Fashion Night in Prague. All the people attending the event were hiding under their umbrellas as they were visiting the luxurious stores and travelling along the busy and boisterous streets. Lots of private cocktail parties and amazing dresses and tunics, pants and shirts, high heels and flats – simply all parts of the guests’ outfits were much on display.  So, as it turned out, the weather didn’t keep the guests from dressing in the best colours – from seashell and light-salmon to saddle-brown and bright orange ones. 

The fashionistas witnessed the current collections of foreign brands: Dior introduced its pre-fall collection created by Raf Simons, Dolce & Gabbana offered its colourful Sicilian campaign and the chic and splendour at Tiffany’s with its new Gatsby-inspired jewelleries.  But don’t forget about the parade of exciting Czech designers: Beata Eden, Natali Ruden, Ivana Mentlová, Klára Nademlýnská and Tatiana Kovaříková.

The evening ended in an emphatic outcry: “Fashion Night: repeat please!” the crowd roared. For the partygoers interested, it was indeed the perfect late spring evening. But I don’t want to foreshadow the events; only time will tell if one can witness again all that gloss and glitter.

You Don't Know What "Loud" Means Unless You've been to a My Bloody Valentine Show (Archa Theater, June 6th 2013)

The Dublin shoegaze greats My Bloody Valentine are one of a kind. They’re one of those rare bands you have to really “get” in order to fully appreciate them, because first time around, you’re usually not prepared for the intense experience, which their trademark wall of sound is. As for seeing them live – brace yourself: your life shall never be the same again.
 
I remember listening (or rather trying to listen) to MBV’s seminal 1991 opus Loveless for the first time some four years ago, being most perplexed. I was desperately trying to figure out what in the world it was that earned the band (who were defunct for 18 years at the time) and their leader Kevin Shields such a cult-like and legendary status. Admittedly, I was then guilty of being distracted by the larger-than-life (and oddly enough somewhat lo-fi at the same time) production, where reverse-reverberated, fuzzy, swirly and just otherworldly guitars dominate the frequency spectrum. This leaves everything else, including vocals, practically buried in the mix, intertwining into a hazy texture of indistinguishable multiple layer sound. Just this fact alone takes a while to get used to, especially if you’ve grown up listening to music that’s in accordance with the generally accepted aesthetic of non-instrumental contemporary music, where everything is usually built around the vocal. Needless to say, I then concluded that this was not my cup of tea and wondered why was Loveless one of the most expensive albums ever made, allegedly costing nearly 250 thousand pounds. 

Flash forward two years from then; I’m watching Sophia Coppola’s Lost in Translation (which had previously left me underwhelmed – why yes, certain things take time) and suddenly a song comes on and… It’s Sometimes from Loveless! The rest is history, as they say: from then on, I was hooked for life. When Kevin Shields announced a new album and a tour earlier this year, everybody’s expectations went through the roof. Lucky for both him and the fans, the expectations were surpassed and then some.

Entering the venue on the night of the concert, I saw several people exchanging confused looks when they were offered a free pair of earplugs at the door. To my advantage, I’ve read numerous accounts from the late 80s and early 90s where unprepared people had to literally run away due to MBV’s overwhelming stage volume levels, which in some cases reportedly led to permanent eardrum damage. Looking at the stage, one could indeed smell danger. Shields’ technicians have set up 10 amplifiers, at least 8 speaker cabinets and a few dozens of effect pedals and processors; little less than that could be seen at Bilinda Butcher’s (rhythm guitarist and lead vocalist) side of the stage. 

The opening band, Rakovník’s Manon Meurt, was a pleasant surprise, not at all Czech-sounding. However, in all of their songs, there didn’t seem to be anything other than obvious tips of the hat to various 90s shoegaze icons (Slowdive, Ride, Flying Saucer Attack), but their role was apparent: not to be original but to prepare the audience for the sheer sonic brutality that MBV are.

Trying to put MBV’s set into words – the phrase “life changing experience” instantly comes to mind. From the first notes of I Only Said, it was crystal clear that they still got “it” – they sound as fresh and unique as they did 22 years ago. The set-list contained both crowd pleasers (When You Sleep, Only Shallow, Soon etc.) and numbers from the new album (New You, Only Tomorrow, Who Sees You etc.), which blended with the classics unexpectedly well. The songs that sound so meticulously produced on the record don’t lose any of their magic live – they only come across infinitely more urgent and tight while retaining their signature dreaminess. 

As the show progressed, the band just oozed energy, the intensity escalated to an incredible level, along with stage volume. Although I’ve read about the “holocaust [sic]” section in the middle of MBV’s usual set closer You Made Me Realise, nothing could have possibly prepared me for the 130 dB fierce showcase of power. For the first time ever, I felt that earplugs weren’t enough; even the stage crew unanimously decided to put their protective headphones on. Along with trippy projections, the colossal amount of feedback and unpredictable patterns of rhythmic noise made for an experience that was nothing short of psychedelic. With my eyes closed, I felt like I was swimming in a dripping matter made of sound, strobe lights were playing tricks on my sensory processing and the pleasantly rumbling low frequencies were vibrating through my whole body. At that point, the band became the audience and the audience became the band. The whole venue became a single entity, living and breathing the moment, embracing the loudness as an indigenous deity.

When it was over, I refused to believe what I’ve just gone through – I felt heavily intoxicated but rest assured, it felt right and natural. Going home, I simply had to smile. My Bloody Valentine had indeed made me realise why they are hailed as one of the most innovative and important acts in the history of music. Do yourself a favour and give Loveless a listen. Chances are, you’ll find yourself gazing at your shoes in no time.

“Breakfast at Midnight” with Country Music at the Jazz Republic in Prague.



On Thursday the 23rd of May, I went to the premier reading of Louis Armand’s Breakfast at Midnight. As the title of this article suggests, it was an evening that consisted of different elements, which formed an exciting experience… And even a month later, I am still positively tuned. 

According to the invitation, all was to begin at 19:30pm. I and my company arrived early, yet – as it is with most or all good things – we waited longer for the show to begin. At least the line at the bar was not so long and I did not have to worry about spilling my drink (Captain Morgan and Coke, if you are wondering) when swaying between the labyrinths of still-empty tables back to the refuge of our own, located in front of the stage.

Entertaining ourselves in conversation, the place meanwhile began filling up; I recognised English-American Studies students, a few teachers from the Faculty of Arts, a small number of individuals from the Prague Love, Blood and Rhetoric theatre group and last but not least, the persona of the evening: Louis Armand. Comme d’habitude, he wore his signature black fedora (called a “pork pie”) as he made last touches to the materials that were to be presented on the reflector screen. 

Soon, the programme of the evening was introduced to the now quite populated Jazz Republic. First Armand read an extract from his novel, then the translator David Vichnar; they were both accompanied by saxophone players who simultaneously bellowed quietly their impromptus. Afterwards, short films were presented, the translated novel was christened and “The Happy Funeral” band hit the stage.


(Photo credits: Anna Hupcejová)

For me and my company, the readings made for an enriching discussion. The same passage was read, yet both had a different rhythm and tone – Armand’s husky low voice embodied the sinful nightlife portrayed while the Czech translation in combination with Vichnar’s almost monotonic recitation seemed to have slightly dried up the fictional narrator’s tone.

The rest of the evening continued in a laid-back fashion; conversing with my table’s company, hitting lightly the table surface with fingers to the rhythm of the band’s merry sounds, watching the Jazz Republic’s population sipping on beer or wine, then laughing at that woman who stood up on her chair and began dancing… I left well before midnight, yet Armand’s recited chant “Godzoway, Godzoway, Godzoway, Bus-iness!” were the first to come in mind the next morning during breakfast.  

An Extended Conversation with Louis Armand

Initially, it was meant to be only a simple interview; something little about his works (as he has had quite a line of poems and novels published, including the recently-translated Breakfast at Midnight) and then a question or two about the Prague Microfestival that he is the co-creator of. Yet as it is with many things in life, things turn out differently than one expects. It was soon after I sat down in front of his desk in the office of the Centre for Critical and Cultural Theory that I realized that this is no man of small talk, but one of many words that convey experience and fine intellectuality. Putting my initial nervousness aside, interviewing him was a mind-opening and unique experience – for the next hour I was in the world of a writer. The following is an approximation of our exchange. (Prepared by Anna Hupcejová)

Did you ever experience a writer’s block?
Writer’s block? Nah. Over the years I’ve collected ideas for pieces I’ve had in mind, putting them down in notebooks that I tend to lose, abandon or just forget about. When I do start writing something, I don’t usually go like “this is the way I want the story to go” – things usually unfold by themselves, so to answer your question, no, I’ve never really experienced writer’s block. Thing is, there’s this sense of anxiety people have when writing, this pressure to write something…

Decent?
Yes. So when you say ‘writer’s block,’ it’s probably just anxiety rather than something specific to writing. But if you believe Freud, everything’s tied back to anxiety anyway, even writing.

How did you get to Prague in the first place?
By complete accident. Back in 1994 I was on my way to Seville for a conference and on the way I stopped in Prague. The city struck me as a city of possibility – pretty much anything was possible. Gradually I contacted people living here, including people working at this faculty – Martin Procházka and Martin Hilský being among them. It basically went on from there. I spent a lot of time hanging out, moving between the different scenes – everyone wanted to be a writer or an artist or a film-maker back then – there was a sense that it could be a way of life instead of (as it seemed elsewhere) a professional occupation. The usual criteria just didn’t apply. But that was a long time ago already… 

What about your family and friends, how did they react to you moving to the other side of the world?
I don’t recall even asking my family about what they thought… Most of the people who knew I was considering it thought I was insane, that it was career suicide. The only person who thought otherwise was the wife of my supervisor, whose advice was always pretty sound. She basically said “yeah, go for it.” I gave up a big scholarship at Sussex for something that was completely unknown for me, but infinitely more interesting. Maybe still is.

Would you compare Prague in the 90’s to Paris in the 20’s?
Well, maybe not exactly, though it’s been done – Alan Levy, the founding editor of the Prague Post, famously made the comparison. He meant there was a certain temper, a sense of being freed from the various cultures of permission and the crushing materialism of the 80s in the US and UK, also a sense of participation in a society that was very consciously experiencing its own freedom after so many years of communism. But unlike Paris, there was rarely that sense of conversation between different cultures here – it was a melting pot of sorts, but this went hand-in-hand with the fact that the different cultures, of the ‘West’ and the ‘East,’ had been cut off from one another for so long, except as objects of mutual fascination. I mean, imaginary objects. In more ways than one, people didn’t speak each other’s languages. It was easier for Paris to be comfortable with its role as an international artistic centre – but this wasn’t the case in Prague, at least for those who ended up pulling the strings.

 
Was it easy to find a publisher for your work, whether poetry, prose or paintings? 
Nah! (Shakes his head vehemently) Nah, it was really hard. Publishing is a strange business which is often heavily localised – whether it’s linked in to the official culture or to subcultures. English-language publishing in Prague was extremely marginal – at the time there was only Twisted Spoon Press, who published my first collection of poetry. But it has tended to be the case that writers in English have had to leave Prague in order to find a publisher – Tom McCarthy’s Men in Space was written here, but it was only published years after he returned to the UK and gained success with his novel Remainder. It’s a little different with poetry, which is mostly a small-press business anyway. Justin Quinn is an example of a Prague-based writer who has had his work widely published and well-received – but again, even when you manage to do that, you’re almost instantly drawn back into some external, national discourse: are you an Irish poet, an Australian poet, a Central European poet. Internationalism is a nice idea, but in the current cultural climate it’s mostly a fiction, which makes living, working, publishing outside the usual frameworks difficult, but also far more interesting. On the other hand, there’s the question of translation. My novel, Breakfast at Midnight, is getting published in Czech soon from Argo (looks at his computer screen, turning to it), which is quite pleasing.

How? Did you contact the publisher yourself or…?
No. Lad’a Nagy published a review of the English version in Hospodářské Noviny and Argo became interested. It all went on from there. Straight away my friend David Vichnar did the translation. Petr Onufer from Argo invited me for a drink, we agreed on a contract, talked about cover art. Bang. It’ll be launched soon at Jazz Republic [Note: a report from the night follows this interview!], I should probably send out a message about it (looks at his computer screen again.)



Do you prefer spending time at expat bars or Czech ones?
My favourite place is Dobrá Trafika, not the one at Újezd, but at Korunní. Very quiet, very low-key. 

So did you always write prose?
Probably I wrote songs first. But my mother was a librarian, so I used to spend quite a lot of time in libraries. I remember the first book of poetry I read, which had stuff by Auden and Kenneth Slessor which gave me some idea of what a ‘poem’ was supposed to be – but I was too young to make much sense of it. Then one day I came across Alexander Pope. I’d never seen anything like it, columns and line numbers and hundreds of stanzas one after the other. I remember thinking: “Hmm… (he frowns with his eyebrows, bewildered) this is quite cool, I’d like to try writing something like that.” Of course, I had no idea what Pope was on about, but it looked interesting. 

How did that turn out?
(Laughs) Well, it was terrible. I wrote lots of mythological garbage, ‘epistles’ to this and that, like everyone does at that age probably, and all the weighty themes. At a certain stage I began noodling around with the ‘inner life.’ I tried writing a novel when I was sixteen. About Faustus, would you believe it? Pure gore! At about the same time I read Baudelaire at school and went through that entire poète maudite phase. Then Eliot. Terrible. I mean, the Eliot phase is always a terrible one, you see it all the time, it’s like a disease you expect ought should’ve been done away with by the advent of modern medicine, but somehow it just keeps infecting people… Anyway, apart from all that, I mostly wrote songs. I liked songs where the words and music didn’t quite add up, where there was a certain tension between the two. I collected liner-notes. In terms of music, though, I had a pretty spotty education. Bob Dylan, The Who, Ricky Lee Jones, Pink Floyd (!). I remember setting some of Blake’s stuff to music. And from there I discovered free verse, which is when it dawned on me that poetry had nothing whatsoever to do with rhyme and meter – amazing!
Is there any book you repeatedly return to? 
(Thinks for a while) Return to? Hmm.

Like a book you open up whenever you got the time?
I read a lot of books, all the time. (Looks around, narrowing his eyes as he peeps at the countless books in the office’s bookshelves) Honestly I can’t think of anything just now.

How about your books, do you have them all lined up on a shelf at home?
Nah, they’re at the bottom of a bookshelf where I just keep copies so I don’t lose them. Unless you mean that you think I sit there and admire them all the time: “yeah, well done mate” (does this kind of American flirtatious wink and onomatopoeic sound, his hand gesticulating a gun that he aims at the imaginary shelf of his written books, smiles). I’ll save that for my pension plan. Steve Rodefer, the poet, lectured me once about how easily your whole past can just slip away – even writers deemed important fall out of print, like Faulkner did, or you look at the whole Anglophone Prague scene from the nineties which almost disappeared without a trace, to the extent it just seemed like a rumour. You know, left bank of the nineties and all that. But in 2010 if you wanted to read what’d actually been written back then, a decade earlier, it was almost impossible… But it happens everywhere of course.

Back to the question about re-reading a single book; so if you had someone, me for example, come up to you and suddenly say: “recommend a book to me to read,” any tips you would give?
There’s an Australian poet I’ve worked with for almost fifteen years, John Kinsella. His volume of collected poems from 1994 is something I keep coming back to. Burroughs is a favourite – Naked Lunch. 

How about some writer today. Ian McEwan?
Not a fan. I read (frowns, trying to remember)Atonement. Yes, it is well enough written, but it’s driven by a rancid sentimentality and it takes an impossible concept, like atonement, and turns it into a cheap literary parlour game. It’s also heavily dependent on Patrick White’s Voss which, flawed in its own way, is a significant achievement – an unrelenting self-criticism by a major writer. McEwan isn’t.

What about Hemingway. 
His language is very efficient. No fat. 

And Joyce?
Well… I think I read some of his books once. I was always impressed that after publishing Ulysses, he had the… single-mindedness to write Finnegan’s Wake. Many people at that time, including his closest friends, thought: What? Are you nuts? Publishing something like THAT after Ulysses?!”

Back to your own work. Is there any peculiar English word that appeals to you? Mmm. How about: “Glop.” Do you know what it means?

No. Is it some Australian slang?
Nah. It’s English, an Anglo-Saxon word, though not common – Auden was fond of it. 

Have you ever used it, even when you’re saying that it’s obscure to you.
Yes, in one of those (points at the stack of three books he gradually gave me during the interview/conversation) I use it a couple of times.

Now, what about the Prague Microfestival.
Olga Pek [a slim, fragile-looking girl sitting at a computer desk near us] is the person to ask about that, as she’s the main organizer of the whole thing. Anyways… yeah, though not as high up an event as, uh, the Prague Writer’s Festival, that’s all the way up here (he demonstrates the high rank in the air with his hand) and brings all the big names to town, or whichever ones they can afford, and give the impression of being very impressed with themselves, while the Microfestival is a more community-centred an event that brings together both well-known and lesser-known writer, mostly poets on the experimental fringe who aren’t usually respected by the  big commercial festivals. This year we have Alice Notley, who’s quite famous, along with Robert Kiely, a young Irish poet, who’s definitely someone to watch in future, and about twenty others, including Slovak and Czech writers, such as Ondřej Buddeus who just received the Orten prize and is one of the best poets in the country.

Leaving the office with three of his books in arms, I immediately added them to my summer reading list. Why? Mainly, to receive a better understanding of the man I have just interviewed… and also to find out how the word “glop” can be practically used.

 

Louis Armand is the Director of the Centre for Critical and Cultural Theory at the Faculty of Arts and author of the novels Canicule or Breakfast at Midnight, anthropologies and poetry volumes. Co-creator of the Prague Microfestival.  Find out more about his works over at